Tuesday, December 24, 2019

Jason Mack. Ms. Davis. English I. 24 April 2017. The Honor

Jason Mack Ms. Davis English I 24 April 2017 The Honor of Sir Galahad The knights of King Arthur’s time were not only brave, but they were righteous, gallant, and faithful. In King Arthur’s time, chivalry was everything. Knights were expected to do battle, be religious, and be respectful to women. One such knight was Sir Galahad. He was the son of Lancelot and Elaine of Corbenic and became a knight at King Arthur’s Round Table. The story of Sir Galahad was shared in The Quest of the Holy Grail from the Middle Ages. It told how Galahad first came to King Arthur’s Round Table, and how despite being brought up by nuns, he was known as a courteous and chivalrous knight. During the medieval era, chivalry was a very important part of society.†¦show more content†¦No one else had been able to do that. It was said that only the world’s best knight could pull out the sword. So he pleased the king. King Arthur proclaimed him to be the greatest knight and invited Galahad to become a Knight of the Round Table. Sir Galaha d was shown to have moral purity by being a trustful, noble leader and putting other people over himself. Because of Galahad’s moral purity and because he was able to pull the sword from the stone so easily, the King asked him to find the Holy Grail. The King said, â€Å"If he be indeed the one for whom we have waited to bring to a close the adventures of the Holy Grail, no man has ever met with greater joy than he shall have of us.† (Matarasso) The actions of Galahad and what was said about him show that he pleased the court and the King. He had possessed many chivalric attributes including courtliness and moral purity. These attributes of courtliness and moral purity were very important in the Medieval society. â€Å"Chivalry is the representative code for the conduct of the knights on the battlefield, involvement in religion, as well as a concept of warfare† (History Professor Nick Smith), Galahad represented chivalry for the reason that he was one of King Arthur’s favorite knights and had expectations for many great descendants. In the Arthurian stories, Galahad was well known

Monday, December 16, 2019

The NYU scholarship on public health graduate program Free Essays

I am pleased to apply for the NYU scholarship on public health graduate program. Since learning is a continuous lifetime process, I always wanted to gain knowledge of something innovative that will make me a better, rational and worthy person. To complement with the dynamic changes of society and provide the high-end demands of daily life, every individual who thirsts for knowledge of information needs further studies in order to sustain such changes and demands. We will write a custom essay sample on The NYU scholarship on public health graduate program or any similar topic only for you Order Now I deem that I will learn about the world’s philosophies and applications in adaptation of its very nature and its elements in connection to International Business and Management geared towards health care. My career objectives in taking up advance study in this field are to become a competent and knowledgeable person when it comes to governance and to learn more for the purpose of service. With the learning experiences that I will acquire in the University, I will be able to materialize all my intentions in serving other people especially those who are in need. I believe that my training and experiences have prepared me for this kind of task since I consider myself result-oriented with a strong entrepreneurship background. My passion for healthcare management has led me towards the publication of a self-motivational weight-loss book called, â€Å"Kimchi Diet.† Together with these skills, I have further honed my knowledge in the area of driving business process, qualitative and quantitative market research and customer service improvements. As a Hospital Strategic Planner, I have achieved significant results related to promoting the growth of the group to where I belong, developing innovative curriculum for effective new staff training thereby increasing overall client volume. In the same vein, I have incorporated my skills in designing and implementing E-commerce sites and web portals in HR communication when I worked at The Gillette Company in Boston Massachusetts. While there, I developed Content Management System for various web projects within the company. I am positive that the innate leadership and powerful drive for service within me will be developed while I am in the institution. I bequeath my humblest leadership, dedication and school spirit for the quest of knowledge. With the acquired knowledge I will have, I am certain to elevate and make better changes in human life not only in the campus but in the community where I belong and intend to serve. My optimism will help bring understanding and wisdom to the all people who need my assistance and service. I want to extend my help to other students in integrating their interests in global, regional and current issues. Through my own dealings of life over the years and a handful of experiences in and out of the four-corners of the classroom, I have grown to be a more responsible and mature person. Indeed, acquiring training in Public Heath Graduate Program will be the first step that I need to take to be able to accomplish my goals. I believe this program will help eager and zealous students like me with its curriculum possessing local and international focus and commitment for excellence. The program is what I need to develop a fuller understanding about the dynamic nature of public health. How to cite The NYU scholarship on public health graduate program, Papers

Saturday, December 7, 2019

John Weary vs. William S. Cochran

Question: Analysis of John Weary, Plaintiff-appellant, v. William S. Cochran, et al., Defendants-appellees, 377 F.3d 522 (6th Cir. 2004). Answer: The name of the case for case law analysis is John Weary, Plaintiff-appellant, v. William S. Cochran, et al., Defendants-appellees, 377 F.3d 522 (6th Cir. 2004). This case was decided in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit opinions. It was filed and decided on 29th July 2004 ("FindLaw's United States Sixth Circuit case and opinions.", 2016). The history of this case was such that this case was on appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee wherein the District Court had dismissed the complaint of John Weary alleging that he had claims against and Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company under the state law of Tennessee and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. 621 et seq (Letizia, 2003). The brief facts of the case are that the company Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company employed for carrying out its business General Agents and Special Agents. Mr. Cochran was hired as a General Agent by the Company and the products exclusive rights to market were given to him in Tennessee (S. Forman B. Thelen, 2004). He further hired 21 Special Agents, and Mr. Weary was one of them. The employment contract of Mr. Weary mentioned that he was an independent contractor and not an employee of the company. Mr. Weary's contract was terminated, and he filed a complaint stating that since he is 40 years it was due to his age that his employment had been terminated therefore violation by the company of state law of Tennessee and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. 621 et seq. The Plaintiff argued that, he was an employee and that Cochran and Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Fired him because he had become 40 years and this became a factor in his termination. The Defendant argued that Mr. Weary was only an independent contractor and not Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company's employee. The main issue of this case was that whether Mr. Weary was an employee of Mr. Cochran or the Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company. In this case, the court analyzed the test of "common law agency" in which the court was required to consider the rights of the hiring party to control the means and manner in which the accomplishment of the product takes place. The court opined that though there were two factors that favoured Mr. Weary's characterization as the employee of the company which is (i) the long duration of the relationship between Mr. Weary and the Company, and (ii) the fact that Mr. Weary's hiring was part of the regular business of the Company. However, only these two factors do not offset the evidence which is overwhelming which indicates that Mr. Weary was nothing but an individual contractor and not the employee of the company ("Sixth Circuit Issues Opinions Concerning Employee versus Independent Contractor Status", 2016). The rule that this decision laid down was for providing guidance to the employers so that they would be able to structure the relationship of the employment in a way which establishes clearly workers as contractors who are independent. References FindLaw's United States Sixth Circuit case and opinions.. (2016).Findlaw. Retrieved 12 July 2016, from https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-6th-circuit/1033918.html Letizia, J. (2003). Independent Contractors Versus Employees: Determining When the Line Has Been Crossed.Home Health Care Management Practice,15(2), 164-165. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1084822302239306 Forman, A. B. Thelen, J. (2004). Sixth Circuit Issues Opinions Concerning When Individuals are Employees Versus Independent Contractors. Retrieved from https://www.martindale.com/labor-employment-law/article_Miller-Canfield-Paddock-Stone-PLC_83318.htm Sixth Circuit Issues Opinions Concerning Employee versus Independent Contractor Status. (2016).Michigan Manufacturers Association. Retrieved 12 July 2016, from https://mimfg.org/NewsInfo/News/DNNArticleDetailView/tabid/690/ArticleId/1239/Sixth-Circuit-Issues-Opinions-Concerning-Employee-versus-Independent-Contractor-Status.aspx